Listen to this blog post
The CarShield Settlement: A Closer Look
- Deceptive Claims: CarShield’s advertising, often featuring celebrity endorsers like Ice-T, promised to give you complete coverage and peace of mind. However, many claims about their coverage were misleading and left consumers to face unexpected repair bills even though they made their monthly payments ranging from $80 to $120.
- Limited Repair Options: All of their advertisements suggested you had the freedom to choose any repair facility, but many consumers found out that their preferred shops didn’t accept CarShield’s VSCs. This limitation inconvenienced customers while directly contradicting the advertised benefits of flexibility and convenience.
- Rental Car Discrepancies: CarShield promised rental cars at no cost during repairs, but the reality was usually different. Consumers with denied claims received no rental support, and even those with approved claims sometimes had to pay out of pocket.
Legal Implications and Consumer Rights
- Consumer Protection Laws: South Carolina’s consumer protection statutes guard against unfair and deceptive business practices. If you’ve had issues similar to the CarShield case, these laws help offer a pathway to recourse.
- Lemon Law and VSCs: While typically applied to new vehicle purchases, Lemon Law can intersect with issues related to VSCs, especially when warranty-like promises are unmet. Consulting with a knowledgeable attorney, like Steve Moskos, can clarify whether your situation might fall under these protections.
How to Protect Yourself
- Read the Fine Print: Always review the terms and conditions of any service contract before signing. Pay attention to coverage exclusions and conditions.
- Verify Promises: Check whether the repair facilities in your area accept the VSC. Don’t rely solely on the provider’s marketing.
- Seek Legal Advice: If you have issues with your VSC, consider consulting with a lawyer experienced in consumer law.